hobbit-humanist

Humanism, atheism, some politics and lots of common sense.

Archive for the category “History”

Exodus 22:18

Exodus 22:18 says;
‘Though shalt not suffer a witch to live.’
Some versions have it down as sorceress instead of witch, same difference. Evidently ‘thou shalt not kill’ has gone out of the window from Exodus 20:13 and its also in Deuteronomy 5:17 and of course is one of the ten commandments though I think its numbered differently on the list catholic and prostestant wise, catholic having it at no.5, protestant no.6.
Of course the above biblical phrase is responsible for the killing of thousands or more possibly tens of thousands of women who were allegedly witches across the world between 1450 and 1780. Women didn’t have to conjure familiars or spout flames from gnarled staves, it was more a case of someone not liking them especially if they had an odd birthmark or they smiled at their husband. An accusation was enough for a dunking in the local pond or some other cruel torture to extract a false confession then it was on to the real crowd pleaser – burnings. All in the name of god.
People in Africa are still being accused of witch craft today for all sorts of ludicrous reasons too numerous to list and persecuted for it. Many hard core western christians tell their kids not to watch things like Harry Potter movies because of so called witchcraft links, utter nonsense!
It really is beyond comprehension that people even today use phrases from the bible to justify things they do. On looking on the net I found comments such as;
‘Zika’s comment on 2013-01-14 11:56:00:

The word of God is Yes and Amen! God is not a man that He will lie. As we must keep His words, “we shall not suffer a witch to live”. Therefore with constant prayer and fasting witches and wizards must not live but either repent or suffer consequences in Jesus’ Name.! Amen. Exodus 22:18.’

Or;
‘sara’s comment on 2013-01-14 01:16:07:

I have been engaged in an intense spiritual warfare with a genuine natural witch for over 10 years. NEVER in my wildest dreams prior to this did I ever believe they existed! So far I have the upper hand and I learned invaluable methods to counterattack and minimize and stop her demonic evil. I have only done so with prayer in the Name of Jesus. I will never physically harm this unrepentant witch – I always give her to God because He is the One she must answer to.’

Yep, this is how idiotic and stupid some Christians really are but then if you believe the bible then you’ll probably believe anything.

No Greater Victory

I can’t deny, I have a weakness for swords and sandal TV shows. The long running Spartacus series finally ended this weekend and although this final series hasn’t been my most favourite it ended with a truly great episode. It’s been a great ride steeped in fake blood, plot, intrigue and plenty of bare flesh. Most productions these days have to be glamorised and changed to appeal to a wide audience, if we had the capability to view real history then much of it would be bloody, grim, dark and make us realise how good we have it today!
As Spartacus lay dying he uttered the words;
‘There is no greater victory than to fall from this world a free man.’
Although he meant freedom from slavery and the Roman republic I couldn’t help feel how the words appealed to me as an atheist because when I die, it will be as a man free of the chains any religion, beholden only to the ones I love.

Good & Bad

Actually I should have called the blog ‘Slight good news and very bad news’. First the good news and a school in Ohio has had to remove a portrait of Jesus. Secular groups and civil rights activists had argued the portrait constituted an unconstitutional endorsement of religion. Why would any schools want religious images and symbols anyway, lets keep it in churches. Nobody knows for sure what Jesus looked like anyway, its pure guess work as the Bible in its wisdom doesn’t give us a description. The first wider spread imagery of course comes from the Constantine era and after when it was assumed he was bearded and robed, if he’d existed of course then there would have been a good chance of that, however I think he’s a construct character and this isn’t a blog about the validity of his being.
On to the bad news. Three bloggers in Bangladesh have been arrested for allegedly defaming Islam. No surprises there as you only have to cough in Islam’s general direction in some countries and you’re in trouble. Ironically I was reading some Islamic history today and the early scholars of Islam are responsible for some remarkable inventions and discoveries, way before Western Christendom began to rise. Sadly though it seems Islam has gone into some kind of reversal through recent times and the only Muslim scholars you hear about these days are the ones that know how to beat women and spout the tenets of Sharia law. I find it amazing you cannot be a non-believer in some countries such as Bangladesh, Saudi Arabia and Indonesia etc. Well maybe you can but its best to keep it quiet and pretend you’re one of them.
The reality is though, if right wing Christianity could get away with some of the things Islam does then it would do because organised religion is about control.

Contentious

Things are quite tough here in the United Kingdom at present. There’s a growing divide between rich and poor, increasing unemployment and rising discontent with the current government. Over the years I’ve seen massive changes in social dynamics here and I can say with some clarity the gaps in society are showing more than ever.
The Arch Bishop of Canterbury Justin Welby has spoken out about recent unemployed and family benefit changes, with the government seeking to cut benefits in almost all areas.
Personally I feel torn about the Arch Bishop getting involved. Yes, he has a right to speak out, and I’m happy he has but I feel this is a secular area and religion shouldn’t be involved. People have argued most of the clergy live in large houses and are somewhat out of touch, others say the church needs to get itself in order before criticising. There’s already too much church involvement in government with the clergy holding seats in the House of Lords, yes we are a secular country but religion does have a sort of indirect say. If we look to history we see religion and politics don’t mix very well and never have.
The reality is, things are getting worse, an increasingly vehement right wing government is purging the poor, using spin and leaking stories of benefit scandals and fraud to the right wing tabloid press in order to stir up social unrest. Some of the UK’s inner cities are no longer good places to go and the north south divide has never been so visible as it is now.
It’s not just Britain though, its worldwide, millions claiming food stamps in America, mass unemployment in some European countries (I really feel for Greece and Spain) and families displaced in the countries that are currently doing well to make way for construction and the rich.
I think its fair to say grim times are ahead, and for a good while too. Growing populations, social unrest, jobs lost to technology and of course possible religious conflicts. The future isn’t going to be pretty and can only be sorted by common sense and pragmatic workable solutions.
Clasping your hands and praying won’t solve anything, and never has.

More Of The Same

Same story, different day. That’s how I feel about the election of the new pope. Argentina’s Cardinal Jorge Bergoglio is now Pope Francis I. What a pope from outside of Italy? Not really, he’s a second generation Italian immigrant, talk about keep it in the family!
What we will get is more of the same prejudice and ignorance by a geriatric that is out of touch. How on earth people can wait outside the Vatican for the news is beyond me, and frankly I feel, quite sad.
When I saw footage from inside the Vatican yesterday and saw all the opulence or… maybe even decadence I thought … if Jesus ever existed is this what he would have wanted or been about?
The Catholic church and everything it stands for sickens me to the core.

Tôi Kratistôi

The thing I notice when I debate with Evangelicals or Jehovah’s Witnesses is their lack of historical knowledge or rather their ignorance of it. Outside of the Bible nothing is really relevant, even when the facts presented are insurmountable. On the other hand of course if there is the vaguest of references to something historical within the Bible then it must be fact because…. you guessed it, the Bible said so!
Take for instance Alexander the Great, undoubtedly one of the greatest figures in antiquity who was widely wrote about and documented. There’s just no denying Alexander, in fact he founded some twenty cities that bore his name. I could of course go on extolling his virtues and story but I’d encourage you to go and read about him instead.
Alexander is alleged in some sources entered Jerusalem on his way down to conquer Egypt its said the locals opened the gates and presented him with the book of Daniel’s Prophecy which allegedly said a mighty Greek king would come and conquer the Persian empire.
There’s also again alleged mention of him in various other religious sources such as this one here quoting Zechariah and Josephus’s writings. Also of not are mention in the apocryphal book of Maccabees excluded from the Bible.
So lets examine some evidence and try and make some assumptions, bearing in mind this is still research in progress and I welcome input.
Firstly we have to bear in mind Alexander was on his way to conquer Egypt taking a coastal route, ports being of vital importance for his campaign. Tyre and Gaza fell to sieges of varying length before he entered Egypt in 332 BC and was proclaimed liberator and Pharaoh without any serious trouble. He stayed in Egypt a while before again crossing swords with his sworn foe Darius in modern day northern Iraq.
Jerusalem in the Persian Achaemenid (or second temple period) was merely a provincial town on no great importance, an estimated population of 1,500 some putting it as low as 500. So compared to some of the coastal cities Alexander was capturing Jerusalem was just a mere dot on the map. Whilst locals may have worshipped local gods I’m guessing there would be external influences too, from Egypt and Persia who had their own deities and controlled the area before Alexander. From a military aspect Jerusalem would logistically have no interest, god wise there was nothing there of note, especially compared to Egypt next door and the fact Alexander wanted to visit the oracle of the Siwa oasis.
Moving to religious evidence. Zechariah contains no names and is cryptic, Daniel is pure prophecy nonsense with no facts, I wouldn’t even call it ambiguous. Maccabees as mentioned is apocryphal and not in the Bible and Josephus the pro Roman historian mentions him allegedly. Lets forgive him a little and put this down to his writing style, even then its vague, after all this was hundreds of years after the alleged event, Alexander’s story was still popular but much would have been lost or embellished, we know Ptolomy I wrote about his adventures with Alexander and possibly there were other books in the great library at Alexandria but this was now destroyed possibly 48 BC according to some historians. Josephus would have been writing about Alexander some hundred or so years after this. I guess concluding we have to look at the fact Josephus was pro Roman having fully defected after his rebel days, Romans liked the myth of Alexander, several prominent Romans such as Pompey, Caesar and Augustus having visited his tomb in Alexandria. So in my view, it would make sense for Josephus to mention him and intertwine him with local folklore in order to increase its importance or was he even added to Josephus’s writings later? If we look at the period, though the Hellenistic period was long gone its history and tales were more recent and available, and very popular among the Romans.
If we look more into Daniel book 11 then nothing really is gained, vague references at best, kings of the north and south in conflict, visions and prophecy. Evangelical interpretations of events in Daniel 11 are bizarre to say the least. In any case the historical predications and historicity of Daniel are wrong.
What I find ironic about the Bible is that usually it seems very keen to name people through its pages yet when it could verify itself more by historical events it falls down badly. Christians will often argue that Josephus and Tacitus mention Jesus but references are vague. Josephus chronicles many uprisings in the area during the time before and after Jesus in detail yet not much is said of Jesus at all, if he has been so great then the pages he wrote would have been surely overflowing with his deeds? As for Tacitus, we have the briefest of mentions of Jesus and not by name, again this is much after and we have to take into account Tacitus wrote more about things such the invasion of Britain than a mere speck of information he offers about an alleged Christ. Other historians of the day give Jesus no mention.
Back to the main thread, did Alexander enter Jerusalem? Though I cannot write it off completely I would say there’s very little evidence for it, there’s plenty of evidence for Alexander being in other places but not there. Logistically it was of no importance, there was nothing of great value there and in the big picture of deities at the time it was of no interest. If he had have gone there and it was an interesting episode then I’m sure it would have been mentioned more especially how important he was. What we have is desperate references from Christian scholars trying to validate their faith. As the Bible was written over hundreds of years there would have been chances aplenty to mention Alexander, and not just him but other events, instead we get very little of historical veracity and when we do stumble across something vague we  get a solid Christian backing of a crumb of something that can be potentially used. I’ve combed my own books on Alexander, the local library and the internet yet there’s little tangible evidence at all Alexander entered Jerusalem.
You can argue all day though with hardcore Christians, Evangelicals and JW’s and they will have their own take on history, which is just the Bible or their version of it, however I’d like to point out that the Bible isn’t found in any History section in a library, ever wondered why?
Alexander was an historical behemoth, covered by Biographer Plutarch, tutored by Aristotle, an unparalleled personality and General and conqueror of much of the then known world, why doesn’t the Bible reference him clearly?
On his deathbed Alexander was asked whom his kingdom should pass? He replied rather laconically “Tôi kratistôi” which means “To the strongest” before passing away yet the successors who carved his empire up with war were never able to rival Alexander for he remains one of the strongest historical figures ever.

Fawning

So Pope Benedict the XVI is gone and will hopefully soon be forgotten. I watched the tv earlier and saw cardinals lined up before him before prostrating themselves and kneeling at his feet, kissing his hands and fawning. Like a long line of scared corrupt generals before a dictator, it was pathetic to watch.
The fact that billions of Catholics look to a frail withered old man for guidance is quite frankly beyond comprehension. It’s been a papacy mired in scandal yet Catholics still revere him, his narrow minded views and his idiotic stances. What’s coming? Well pretty much more of the same I guess because religion refuses to move forward… well apart from the Pope getting a Twitter account.
Yep, Popes don’t do progress well really, as I sat reading today I stumbled across two great examples;
Pope Gregory I (The Great) (540-604 AD)
This guy made his name for getting the patrician of Constantinople burnt at the stake because he claimed the resurrection of the dead would be incorporeal, nice fella then. Anyway this is what he had to say;
“The bliss of the elect in heaven would not be perfect unless they were able to look across the abyss and enjoy the agonies of their brethren in eternal fire.”
If you think that is bad then check out this bad boy,
Pope Gregory VI (d. 1048 AD)
Yep, a few popes later and this guy purchased the papacy from his godson, pope Benedict IX because he wanted to abdicate and marry. Here’s what this one had to say;
“From the polluted fountain of that absurd and erroneous doctrine, or rather raving, which claims and defends liberty conscience for everyone … come, in a word, the worst plague of all – liberty of opinions and free speech.”
Religion and progess? Not a chance.

End Game

Religion is obsessed with the end, not only of life but of the world. Everything religious people do is scrutinized throughout their lives by whatever celestial dictators they worship and when the final curtain closes on life they are judged. Every religion has its different take on things, from attaining nirvana, residing in purgatory before admittance, limbo, reincarnation in the caste system and so on.
If you’re one of the faithful from any of the Abrahamic faiths and have followed the rules, survived the scrutiny and done your best then you’ll probably be heaven bound, if you have any doubt or haven’t been that good there’s always the death bed redemption option and cross your fingers. Hopefully you’ll end up in heaven, if you don’t then its hell, which according to a christian I was watching on tv the other day was also created by god, because he created everything.
Christians portray heaven as a place bereft of suffering, pain or death, hunger and thirst (Rev 7:16, 21:4-8). It’s also some sort of eternal city (Heb 11:16, 123:14), I’m guessing it must be massive beyond comprehension, I certainly hope the transport infrastructure is better than the London underground! There’s supposed to be many rooms (John 14:2-4)! Lastly and no surprised its viewed as being above us and old JC is sat there beside god (Colossians 3:1-7) and of course I could ramble on.
The muslims however are more elaborate in describing how heaven is. The Koran goes into detail describing heavenly banquets and wine (83:25, 47:15). They eat pork and wear gold (52:22, 18:31). If you have a healthy libido then you’re in for a treat because you get to fondle houris, have virginal women and caress beautiful youths (44:54, 55:70 & 56:17).
Seriously heaven sounds so good why don’t christians or muslims cut to the chase if they’ve obeyed the rules and get in on the eternal fun now?
You might not have to worry about death though as the end of the world is surely coming, the rapture or apocalypse, maybe Jesus on a chariot in the sky dealing retribution or perhaps Mohammed wielding a massive scimitar smiting infidels. The end hasn’t just been predicted in the holy books we’ve had many tell us of the impending doom on its way from the recent Harold Camping (how foolish his flock must be feeling now) to historical ones such as Jonas Wendell, Charles Taze Russell and a whole list here, I see Pat Robertson is on the list too, we’re still here Pat!
I find myself imagining a scenario writing this blog. My eyes open and I awake in a very sparsely furnished room, a balding man sits perched on the front of a desk looking at me with a frown. He introduces himself as St Peter and explains I’ve awoken in heaven. “How?” I ask incredulously, shocked and amazed that an atheist like me is in heaven and doubly shocked (and horrified somewhat) that it’s actually real.
St Peter tells me what’s happened. It turns out I ran into a busy street and pushed a small child to safety from an oncoming car, the child was the daughter of a prominent christian and god noticed my selfless human act. The child was pushed to safety but I was hit by the car, and died. Now I’m in heaven because of this act but St Peter feels he has a dilemma, does he admit me for the act I did or dismiss me for my atheist life, I guess he could be smug in the fact right now I am being presented with the reality of heaven.
If I do get admitted through the door behind the desk then an eternity of worship awaits me, daily church services, a reintroduction to people I never liked in the physical life and now have to spend forever with, an ethereal realm devoid of time … almost like being unemployed forever so gradually your impetus to do anything wanes because you have forever to accomplish anything you want. Whilst all of this is happening the powers that be are watching my every move, heaven is what I feared, a dystopian, Orwellian realm run by a celestial dictator of epic proportions. Do I really want to be there?
I wouldn’t just accept my fate though, I’d seek an audience with the big cheese and tell him what I thought. I’d tell him what a shambles he’s running down on earth. I’d ask why he is represented by crooks, perverts and frauds? I’d ask him to explain the suffering of millions throughout the ages? I’d ask him why hasn’t he punched out the other gods? I’d ask him since I was there for the duration – where the nearest pub was?!
Back to rational reality. I’m not scared of dying, there’s nothing I can do about it so why worry about something I have no control of? When my body gives up on me, hopefully in old age I’ll be glad of the respite from pain, happy with my stint on this planet, happy that I am giving way for others in the cycle of things. I literally think death is the end, a blackness yet a peaceful blackness. I’ve had my time, I’ve done my thing. I’m here because of amazing chance and circumstance and I was lucky to take part and whilst I was here I never bowed down or sold out to the manufactured imaginary beings called gods but lived my life to the fullest I could because rationality told me as far as I knew – it was the only one I’d got.

Oh Those Pesky Popes!

If you thought the current Pope Benedict XVI who resigned on the 11th of this month was a bit questionable on some things then lets take a trip through history and have a look at some previous ones.
Pope Stephen VI (896-897).
Something of a nasty piece of work. He exhumed the previous Pope Formusus and put his rotting corpse on trial in January of 897. The corpse was propped up on a throne and a deacon had to answer for him. His crimes? Performing the duties of a bishop when he wasn’t one, among other chargers. After being found guilty the cadaver of Formusus was stripped of all sacred vestments and buried in a grave garbed as a layman with three fingers of the right hand (the so called blessing fingers) being cut off. That wasn’t enough though, the body was dug up again and thrown into the river Tiber. The events caused concern within the ruling powers of the day and Stephen was imprisoned and strangled.
Pope Sergius III (897-911)
Sergius was only pope known to have ordered the murder of another pope and the only pope known to have fathered an illegitimate son who later became pope; his pontificate has been described as “dismal and disgraceful”. The pontificate of Sergius III was remarkable for the rise of what papal historians call a “pornocracy,” or rule of the harlots, a reversal of the natural order as they saw it. A mistress of his gave birth to the later Pope John XI.
Pope John XII (955-964)
If you thought Benedict IX was having all the fun you’d be wrong, enter John XII. On 963, Holy Roman Emperor Otto I summoned a council, levelling charges that John had ordained a deacon in a stable, consecrated a 10-year-old boy as bishop of Todi, converted the Lateran Palace into a brothel (that place again!), raped female pilgrims in St. Peter’s, stolen church offerings, drank toasts to the devil, and invoked the aid of Jove, Venus, and other pagan gods when playing dice. He was deposed, but returned as pope when Otto left Rome, maiming and mutilating all who had opposed him. On 964, he was apparently beaten by the husband of a woman with which he was having an affair, dying three days later without receiving confession or the sacraments.
Pope Boniface (974, 984-5)
Known as an anti-pope, he’s alleged to have put pope Benedict the VI to death. He evidently wasn’t popular and when things went wrong and there were uprisings against him he fled with vast amounts of treasure to Constantinople but came back later to depose pope John XIV. Boniface is said to have died under suspicious circumstances, no kidding?!
Pope John XV (985-996)
The Pope’s venality and nepotism had made him very unpopular with the citizens, as he split the church’s finances among his relatives and was described as “covetous of filthy lucre and corrupt in all his acts”.
Pope Benedict the IX (1032-1044 then again in 1045, then again in 1047-48)
There’s no doubting Benedict IX was a bit of a character and one of my personal favourites. the only man to have served as Pope for three discontinuous periods, and one of the most controversial Popes of all time. Benedict gave up his papacy for the first time in exchange for a large sum of money in 1044. He returned in 1045 to depose his replacement and reigned for one month. after which he left again, possibly to marry, and sold the papacy for a second time, to his Godfather (possibly for over 650 kg /1450 lb of gold). Two years later, Benedict retook Rome and reigned for an additional one year, until 1048. Poppo of Brixen (later to become Pope Damascus II) eventually forced him out of Rome. Benedict’s place and date of death are unknown. It’s said he knew very little theological stuff but didn’t care because he was well connected. He’s often quoted as being the first homosexual pope and had orgies in the Lateran palace. The Catholic Encyclopaedia calls him “a disgrace to the Chair of Peter”, I call him a party animal. There’s so much more I could say on this one but I suspect you get the idea!
Pope Innocent IV (1243-1254)
Innocent by name but don’t be fooled. Mr Inquisition himself ordered the papal bull ‘Ad Extirpanda’ which basically authorised torture to get so called heretics to confess. One of the most famous people being tortured by inquisitors was of course Galileo or said that the earth revolved around the sun (and was right of course). He also issued papal bulls against the Mongol’s and asked them to stop killing christians (though it was alright for christians to kill fellow christians and none christians), they weren’t impressed and sent a letter back telling him to shove it where the sun don’t shine.
Pope Urban XI (1378-1389)
He was the first Pope of the Western Schism (which ultimately lead to three people claiming the Papal throne at the same time). I guess everyone wanted in on the orgies, torture and murder then? Launched a program of violence against those he thought to have been conspiring against him, imprisoning people at will and mistreating them brutally. Later historians have considered seriously that he might have been insane. He is said to have complained he did not hear enough screaming when cardinals were being tortured.
Pope Alexander VI (1492-1503)
He is one of the most controversial of the Renaissance popes, and his Italianized surname Borgia became a byword for libertinism and nepotism. Pope Alexander’s claims to fame were taking over much of Italy by force with the help of his son Cesare (yes, his son), a racy relationship with his daughter Lucrezia (some say her son was his), and his affinity for throwing large parties, bordering on orgies, that usually culminated with little naked boys jumping out of large cakes.
Pope Leo X (1513 to 1521)
Known mainly for the sale of indulgences (an alleged guaranteed ticket to heaven etc) which the profits were used to rebuild St Peters basilica and to challenge the upstart Martin Luther, evidently you needed cash to thwart rivals back then, having god in your corner wasn’t enough. His decadence pissed people off and an assassination attempt was tried but failed. Leo was no idiot and had the conspirators poisoned.
Pope Paul IV (1555-59?)
Pronounced the Jews condemned to slavery by god, created the ghetto of Rome and is quoted as saying “If my own father were a heretic I would personally gather the wood to burn him.”
 Pope Pius XI (1922-1939)
 Personally blessed Italian planes that went to bomb Ethiopian villages during the 1935 war of imperial conquest. Is quoted to have said “Mussolini is a wonderful man. Do you hear me, a wonderful man!”. Oh dear.
Pope Pius XII (1939-1948)
A professional fence sitter during world war two. Roman Catholics in Poland felt betrayed by him when Germany invaded and he didn’t condemn the deaths of around 1,800,000–1,900,000 Poles. Followed a policy of neutrality though he had many dodgy friendships with German hierarchy and people like  Ante Pavelić. Ignored reports of the holocaust. Enough said. I wrote a blog on Pius XI & XII in more detail here).
And of course we have the outgoing one …. number 265th
Pope Benedict XVI (2005 – gone very soon)
Where do I start? Didn’t like cohabiting which he thought was “gravely sinful” and undermined society (March 2012). Didn’t like condoms “[AIDS is] a tragedy that cannot be overcome by money alone, that cannot be overcome through the distribution of condoms, which even aggravates the problems.”(March 2009). Didn’t like gay or lesbian people “Although the particular inclination of the homosexual person is not a sin, it is a more or less strong tendency ordered to an intrinsic moral evil, and thus the inclination itself must be seen as an objective disorder.” (1986). And of gay marriage “[It's] an offence against the truth of the human person, with serious harm to justice and peace.” (December 2012). If you happily married heterosexual couples think you got off lightly then think again, couples that opt for any birth control method outside of Rick Santorum’s questionable “Rhythm Method” (which successfully created eight children) are “negating the intimate truth of conjugal love.” (October 2008).
And sexual abuse revelations and countless claims within the catholic church? Let’s not even go there because my fingers would fall off with the typing needed!

Retiring

So the Pope Benedict XVI is retiring and the media go into a frenzy about it. Yep he’s pulling out early, like a true catholic if you’ll pardon the pun!
I could say I hope the next pope is more in touch with today’s issues and concerns but my guess is he won’t be but then I don’t really give a damn about the catholic church. He won’t be remembered well in history, negative views against women priests and homosexuals haven’t done him any favours.
Part of me wants to have a rant but it’s late, I’m tired and in this case one ignorant religious man will replace another, it’s a given really.

Post Navigation

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 89 other followers